Métodos para la detección de a la detección de Xanthomonas Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria en semilla de toma en semilla de tomate (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59741/agraria.v14i2.240Keywords:
diagnosis, Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria, tomato, seedAbstract
The culture of tomato occupies the second place in Méxicol according to the surface seeded and first per the production value. This culture is affected by several patho genic agents among which Xanthomonas campestris pv. Vesicatoria,, is considered the most dangerous. When importing tomato seed, chances are that some pathogenic stocks are intro duced to the country, since this microorganism is transmitted by this route.
The aim of this work was to determine the best method for the detection of bacterium X. c. pv. vesicatoria in tomato seed. This research was made in laboratories and greenhouses of the Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, where seeds of com mercial lots of the varieties Hayslip, Homestead 61, Rio Grande and Winner were ana lyzed. 12 grams of seed of each variety were placed in a phosphate buffer 0,05 M, to 4ºC, during all night, and later serial dilutions of the filtrate of the seed and the buffer were made. 0,1 mililiter was seeded, of each dilution (mother solution, 10 -1, 10 -2 and 10 -3) for the recovery of the bacteria in the methods Tween B, CKTM and TBCK, under a bifactorial adjustment three by four, in a completely at random design with three replications. There were no differences between methods as far as detection of the bacteria in UFC/g was concerned, but they were found between varieties, of which the most contaminated by this bacteria were the Hayslip and the Rio Grande. As far as time of appearance of the UFC is concerned in each of the methods, the best one was the Tween B, that registered an average in the appearance of the UFC of 84 hours. With respect to the germination capac ity, there were no differences between varieties. The identification of the stocks was made by means of biochemical tests, semiselective sowing in differential environments, and tests of pathogenicity ; the symptoms appeared of 12 to 14 days after the inoculations in the fruits, and the isolation of the bacteria corresponded again to the one isolated initially.
Downloads
References
Bouzar, H., Jones, J. B., Stall, R. E., Hodge, N. C., Minsavage, G. V., Benedict, A. A. and Alvarez A. M. 1994. Physiological, chemical, serological, and pathogenic analyses of a worldwide collection of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria Strains. Phy topathology 84: 663-671. United States of America. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-84-663
Bringas, G. L. 1995. Panorama del cultivo del tomate. Productores de hortalizas. Vol. X. pp 10-11.
Cox, R. S. 1966. The role of bacterial spot in tomato production in south Florida. Plant Disease Reporter. 50: 699-700. United States of America.
Gitaitsis, R. D., Sasser, M. J., Beaver, R. W., McInnes, T. B., and Stall, R. E. 1987. Pectolytic Xanthomonads in mixed infections with Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae, P. syringae pv. tomato, and Xanthomonascampestris pv. vesicatoria in tomato and pepper transplants. Phytopathology 77: 6ll-615. United States of America. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-77-611
Gitaitis, R., McCarter, S., and Jones, J. 1992. Disease control in tomato transplants produced in Georgia and Florida. Plant Disease 76: 651-656. United States of America. Kado, C. I., and Heskett, M. G. 1970. Selective media for isolation of Agrobacterium, Coryne bacterium, Erwinia, Pseudomonas and Xanthomonas. Phytopathology 60:969-976. United States of America. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-60-969
McGuire, R. G., Jones, J. B., and Sasser, M. 1986. Tween Media for the semiselective isolation of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria from soil and plant material. Plant Disease 70: 887-891. United States of America. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-70-887
Peterson, G. H. 1963. Survival of Xanthomonas vesicatoria in soil and diseased tomato plants. Phytopathology 53: 765-767. United States of America.
Poplawsky, A. R. and Chun, W. 1995. Strains of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris with atypical pigmentation Isolated from commercial crucifer seeds. Plant Dis ease 79: 1021-1024. United States of America. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-79-1021
Randhawa, P. 1996. Theory and principals seedborne bacteria and their detection. II Curso Internacional “Métodos para la detección de patógenos en semillas”. 21-28 junio. UAAAN. Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila, México.
Schaad, N. W. 1994. Laboratory guide for Identification of plant pathogenic bacteria. 2nd Edition. APS Press. Minnesota, United States of América. 176 p.
Sijam, K., Chang, C. J., and Gitaitis,R. D. 1991. An Agar Medium for the isolation and identi fication of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria from seed. Phytopathol ogy 81: 831-834. United States of America. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-81-831
Stall, R. E., Hall, C. B., and CooK, A. A. 1972. Relationship of ammonia to necrosis of pepper leaf tissue during colonization by Xanthomonas vesicatoria. Phytopathology 62:882-886. United States of America. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-62-882
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
PLUMX Metrics