In vitro propagation of Epithelantha micromeris (Engelm.) A. Weber ex Britt & Rose (Cactaceae), species with special protection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59741/agraria.v11i3.479Keywords:
Cacti, Epithelantha micromeris (Engelm.) A. Weber ex Britt. & Rose, micropropagation, hormonesAbstract
The Cactaceae family is considered one of the most diverse of Mexico. Its peculiar shapes and high adaptability in arid areas have been a source of fascination for domestic and foreign collectors. Although a large number of species are included in lists of special protection, the constant pressure of collection for purposes of illegal trade has continued, seriously damaging populations, and completely destroying their habitat. The cactus Epithelantha micromeris considered a very beautiful species is listed as a species with special protection accord ing to NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010, despite this its looting and illegal marketing is a reality, so it is necessary to propagate it efficiently and ensure its conservation. One option for this is the micropropagation technique, which can generate all desired seedlings from a single copy. The objective of this research was to evaluate the addition of plant growth regulators to basal media Murashige & Skoog to make more efficient the in vitro propagation. Three plant hormones were ap plied: indol acetico acid (IAA), kinetin (KIN), gibberellic acid (GA) and the interaction between them forming four treatments. A completely randomized design with six replicates was used. The vitroplants were kept under controlled environmental conditions for 30, 60 and 90 d. After each period the number of shoots, diameter, height, fresh and dry weight and percent yield were evaluated. The data were subjected to analysis of variance and differences between means as determined by a Tukey test (p<0.05). KIN-based treatments had significant effects on diameter, height and weight, but only KIN-IAA interaction pro moted shoot formation, regarded as the best treatment.
Downloads
References
Alanís-Flores, G.J. y C.G. Velasco-Macías. 2008. Importancia de las cactáceas como recurso natural en el Noreste de México. Ciencia uanl 11(1): 5-11.
Arias, S., U. Guzmán, M.C. Mandujano, M. Soto G. y J. Golubov. 2005. Las especies mexicanas de cactáceas en riesgo de extinción I. Cact. Suc. Mex. 50(4): 101-124.
Benítez, H. y P. Dávila. 2002. Las cactáceas mexicanas en el contexto de la cites. Conabio. Biodiversitas 40: 8-11. Bravo-Hollis, H. 1978. Las cactáceas de México. Vol. I. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F., 743 pp.
Choreño-Tapia, J.M., H. González-Rosas, T. Terrazas Salgado y A. Hernández-Livera. 2002. Propagación in vitro de Cephalocereus senilis Haworth Pfeiffer a partir de areólas. Rev. Chapingo Ser. Hort. 8(2): 183-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchsh.2001.01.008
Clayton, P.W., J.F. Hubstenberger and G.C. Phillips. 1990. Micropropagation of members of the Cactacea subtribe Cactinae. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci 115(2): 337-343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.115.2.337
Echenique, V., C. Rubinstein y L. Mroginski. 2004. Bio tecnología y mejoramiento vegetal. Ediciones INTA. Buenos Aires, Argentina, 448 pp.
Flores, A. 2005. Guía de Cactáceas del Estado de Coahuila. Instituto Coahuilense de Ecología. Gobierno del Estado de Coahuila. 105 pp.
Flores, P.M.G. 2011. Micropropagación de Epithelantha micromeris Engelman para la Generación de Brotes. Tesis de Licenciatura. Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Saltillo, Coah., México, 62 pp.
Hernández, H.M. y H. Godínez A. 1994. Contribución al conocimiento de las cactáceas mexicanas amenazadas. Acta Bot. Mex. 26: 33-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21829/abm26.1994.690
Jiménez, S.C.L. 2011. Las cactáceas mexicanas y los riesgos que enfrentan. Rev. Digital Universitaria 12(1): 3-23. Johnson, J.L. and E.R. Emino. 1979. Tissue culture pro pagation in the Cactaceae. Cact. Succ. J. 51: 275-277. Malda, G., R. Backhaus y C. Martin. 1999. Alterations in
growth and crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) activity of in vitro cultured cactus. Plant Cell Tiss. Org.58: 1-9.
Mauseth, J.D. and W. Halperin. 1975. Hormonal Control of Organogenesis in Opuntia polyacantha (Cacta ceae). Amer. J. Bot. 62(8): 869-877. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1975.tb14127.x
Murashige, T. and F. Skoog. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473-497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
Navarro, M.C. y A.P. Demeneghi. 2007. Germinación de semillas y efecto de las hormonas en el crecimiento de Mammillaria pectinifera. Zonas Áridas 11(1): 233-239.
Semarnat, 2010. Norma Oficial Mexicana nom-059-se marnat-2010, Protección ambiental - Especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres - Categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio - Lista de especies en riesgo. Diario Oficial de la Federación. 30 de diciembre de 2010, Segunda Sección, México.
Velázquez-Enciso, L.E. y R. Soltero-Quintana. 2001. Micropropagación de Epithelantha micromeris (Eng.). Weber ex Britton et Rose. var. micromeris, Cactaceae. Cact. Suc. Mex. 46(3): 56-62.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
PLUMX Metrics