From green lungs to guardians of territory: Protected Natural Areas as axes of ecological connectivity in the urban-rural gradient
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59741/agraria.v23iE1.747Keywords:
biodiversity, conservation, ecological connectivity, ecosystemic services, socialecosystemsAbstract
Protected Natural Areas (PNAs) are legally established territories designated to conserve biodiversity, ecological processes, and the cultural values associated with ecosystems. In Mexico and globally, they play a strategic role as species refuges, regulators of local climate, protectors of water sources, and key spaces for recreation, environmental education, and human well-being. Their diverse categories and management schemes reflects the ecological and social heterogeneity of the landscapes in which they embedded, as well as specific conservation objectives. The aim of this study was to analyze the differences and complementarities of PNAs along the urban-rural gradient, highlighting how, despite facing specific pressures such as fragmentation, urban expansion, and land-use change, they contribute in an integrated manner to biodiversity conservation, the provision of ecosystem services, and territorial resilience. In urban environments, PNAs function as essential green infrastructure by mitigating air pollution, regulating temperature, and providing opportunities for direct contact with nature in contexts dominated by gray infrastructure, with immediate benefits for the physical and emotional health of the population. In peri-urban and rural areas, PNAs sustain larger-scale ecological processes, such as biological corridor connectivity, the conservation of endemic species, and the provision of ecosystem services that support community life and productive activities. Although their everyday recreational use is often more limited, their importance lies in their role as long-term strategic reserves.
Downloads
References
Aguilar, A.G.; Flores, M.A.; Lara, L.F. (2022) Peri-urbanization and land use fragmentation in Mexico City. Informality, environmental deterioration, and ineffective urban policy. Frontiers in Sustainabkle Cities, 4, 790474. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2022.790474 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2022.790474
Baldi, G.; Texeira, M.; Martin, O.A.; et al. (2017) Opportunities drive the global distribution of protected areas. Peer Journal, 5, e2989. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2989 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2989
Balvanera, P.; Uriarte, M.; Almeida-Leñero, L.; et al. (2012) Ecosystem services research in Latin America: The state of the art. Ecosystem Services, 2, 56-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.09.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.09.006
Bierwagen, B.G. (2005) Predicting ecological connectivity in urbanizing landscapes. Environmental and Planning B: Planning and Design, 32, 763-776. https://doi.org/10.1068/b31134 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/b31134
Bowler, D.E.; Buyung-Ali, L.; Knight, T.M.; Pullin, A.S. (2010) Urban greening to cool towns and cities: A systematic review of the empirical evidence. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97(3), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006
CONANP (Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas) (2024) Programa Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas 2020-2024. CONANP. Disponible en https://www.conanp.gob.mx/datos_abiertos/DES/PNANP2020-2024.pdf
Dudley, N. (2008) Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. IUCN. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2008.PAPS.2.en DOI: https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2008.PAPS.2.en
Ferraz, S.F.B.; Ferraz, K.M.P.M.B.; Cassiano, C.C.; et al. (2014) How good are tropical forest patches for ecosystem services provisioning? Landscape Ecology, 29(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-9988-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-9988-z
Forman, R.T.T. (2014) Urban ecology: Science of cities. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139030472
Geldmann, J.; Manica, A.; Burgess, N.D.; Coad, L.; Balmford, A. (2019) A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(46), 23209–23215. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908221116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908221116
Gómez-Baggethun, E.; Barton, D.N. (2013) Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecological Economics, 86, 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019
Gray, C.L.; Hill, S.L.L.; Newbold, T.; et al. (2016). Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide. Nature Communications, 7, 12306. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12306
Haddad, N.M.; Brudvig, L.A.; Clobert, J.; et al. (2015) Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Science Advances, 1(2), e1500052. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500052
Hernández-Romero, P.C.; Von Thaden-Ugalde, J.J.; Muench, C.E.; et al. (2024) Species richness and ecological connectivity of the mammal communities in urban and peri-urban areas at Mexico City. Urban Ecosystems, 27, 1781–1794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-024-01553-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-024-01553-x
McDonnell, M.J.; Pickett, S.T.A. (1990). Ecosystem structure and function along urban–rural gradients: An unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology, 71(4), 1232–1237. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938259 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1938259
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Island Press.
Open AI (2026a) Gradiente de un ANP en la ciudad hacia la periferia [imagen generada con inteligencia artificial]. ChatGPT. https://chat.openai.com/
Open AI (2026b) Ubicación de algunas ANP en la Zona Metropolitana de la Ciudad de México considerando el gradiente urbano-rural [imagen generada con inteligencia artificial]. ChatGPT. https://chat.openai.com/
Reyes-García, V.; Fernández-Llamazares, Á.; McElwee, P.; et al. (2020) The contributions of Indigenous Peoples and local communities to ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology, 28(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12894 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12894
Seto, K.C.; Güneralp, B.; Hutyra, L.R. (2012) Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(40), 16083–16088. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211658109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211658109
Taylor, P.D. (2000) Landscape Connectivity. In: Ekbom, B.; Irwin, M.E.; Robert, Y. (Eds.), Interchanges of insects between agricultural and Surrounding Landscapes. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1913-1_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1913-1_7
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
PLUMX Metrics