Rendimiento y calidad de dos genotipos de tomate, cultivado en mezclas de vermicomposta y arena, bajo condiciones de invernadero

Authors

  • Alejandro Moreno-Reséndez Departamento de Suelos. UAAAN.
  • Lilia del Carmen Ávalos-García IngenieroAgrónomo en Horticultura.
  • Pedro Cano-Ríos Profesor Investigador del Departamento de Horticultura.
  • Víctor Martínez Cueto Profesor Investigador del Departamento de Horticultura.
  • José Luis Reyes-Carrillo Profesor Investigador del Departamento de Biología.
  • Norma Rodríguez-Dimas Asesor Externo. Maestro en Ciencias Agrarias. Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro Unidad Laguna. Periférico y Carretera a Santa Fé s/n. Torreón, Coah, México. CP27059.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59741/agraria.v2i1.322

Keywords:

Lycopersicon esculentum, Eisenia fetida, growing media

Abstract

Yield and quality of two tomato genotypes, growing in vermicompost and river sand mixtures, under greenhouse conditions. This experiment was carried out under greenhouse conditions, in order to evaluate the behavior of two tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) commercial genotypes; Andre and Adela, both of indeterminate growth habits, to establish the optimum mixture of vermicompost (VC) and river sand (RS) to satisfy the nutritional needs of this crop. The sowing of seeds was made as of June 25th 2002 in a 200 cavities polystyrene tray, padded with Peat Most. The transplant was carried out on Agust 4 placing the tomato seedlings in black plastic bags of 25 kg/ea. In this experiment four mixtures of vermicompost and river sand (VC:RS) were studied: 12.5:87.5; 25:75; 37.5:62.5 and 50:50 (percent weight basis). The pots were placed in the greenhouse at two staggered rows 30 cm apart. A total of eight treatments were evaluated, two genotypes and four mixtures of VC:RS with four replicates every one. The treatments were arranged on a randomized block design and its means were compared by the LSD test (5 %). In function of the evaluated variables in the genotypes [fruit weight, equatorial and polar diameters, and soluble solids (°Brix), had highly significant differences (P £ 0.01) and the variable number of clusters significant difference (P £ 0.05)] it was determined that the genotype Andre overcame to the genotype Adela in the levels of the VC:RS mixtures, from 25:75 to 37.5:62.5 (% weight basis). Furthermore, since, as both genotypes achieve their development in the different mixtures of VC:RS, without synthetic fertilizers, is possible to conclude that the vermicompost can be used to supply the tomato crop nutrient requirement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Atiyeh, R. M., S. Subler, C. A. Edwards, G. Bachman, J. D. Metzger and W. Shuster. 2000a. Effects of vermicomposts and composts on plant growth in horti cultural container media and soil. Pedobiologia 44: 579- 590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1078/S0031-4056(04)70073-6

Atiyeh, R. M., N. Arancon, C. A. Edwards, and J. D. Metzger. 2000b. Influence of earthworm-processed pig manure on the growth and yield of greenhouse toma toes. Bioresour. Technol. 75(3): 175-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00064-X

Atiyeh, R. M., C. A. Edwards, S. Subler, and J. D. Metzger. 2001. Pig manure vermicompost as a com ponent of a horticultural bedding plant medium: effects on physicochemical properties and plant growth. Bioresour. Technol. 78(1): 11-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00172-3

Atiyeh, R. M., S. Lee, C. A. Edwards, N. Q. Arancon, and J. D. Metzger. 2002. The influence of humic acids derived from earthworm-processed organic wastes on plant growth. Bioresour. Technol. 84(1): 7-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00017-2

Bansal, S., and K.K. Kapoor. 2000. Vermicomposting of crop residues and cattle dung with Eisenia foetida. Bioresour. Technol. 73(2): 95-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00173-X

Bravo-Varas, A. 1996. Técnicas y aplicaciones del cultivo de la lombriz roja californiana. (Eisenia foetida). Facultad de Humanidades. Universidad Yacambu, Barquisimeto, Venezuela 6 p. http:// usuarios.arnet.com.ar/mmorra/vravovaras.html (15 de diciembre de 2001).

Brown, G.G., I. Barois, and P. Lavelle. 2000. Regulation of soil organic matter dynamics and microbial activity in the drilosphere and the role of interactions with other edaphic functional domains. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 36(3): 177- 198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1164-5563(00)01062-1

Buck, C., M. Langmaack, and S. Schrader. 1999. Nutri ent content of earthworm casts influenced by different mulch types. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 35(1): 23-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1164-5563(99)00102-8

Chan, K.Y. 2001. An overview of some tillage impacts on earthworm population abundance and diversity -impli cations for functioning in soils. Soil Till. Res. 57(4): 179- 191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(00)00173-2

Cracogna, M. F., M.N. Fogar, D. Rotela, y M.C., Iglesias. 2001. Uso de lombricompuesto e inoculante con Azospirillum sp, en el cultivo del zapallo anquito (Cucurbita moschata L.) (I). Ciencia & Técnica. Comunicaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Ciencias Agrarias No. 045, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste, Corrientes, Argentina. 4 p. http://www.unne.edu.ar/ cyt/2001/cyt.htm (1 de julio de 2003).

Diez, J. M. 1995. Tipos varietales. pp. 95 – 129. In: F. Nuez (Ed.). El cultivo del tomate. Editorial Mundi Prensa, México.

Edwards, C. and Steele, J. 1997. Using earthworm sys tems. Biocycle 38(7): 63-64.

Hansen, B., H.F. Alrøe, and E.S. Kristensen. 2001. Ap proaches to assess the environmental impact of organic farming with particular regard to Denmark. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ 83(1): 11-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00257-7

Karsten, G.R., and H.L. Drake. 1995. Comparative as sessment of the aerobic and anaerobic microfloras of earthworm guts and forest soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61(3): 1039–1044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.61.3.1039-1044.1995

Manjarrez-Martínez, M.J., R. Ferrera-Cerrato, and M.C. González-Chávez. 1999. Efecto de la vermicomposta y la micorriza arbuscular en el desarrollo y tasa fotosintética de chile serrano. Terra 17(1): 9-15.

Ndegwa, P. M., S. A. Thompson, and K.C. Dass. 2000. Effects of stocking density and feeding rate on vermicomposting of biosolids. Biores. Technol. 71(1): 5-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00055-3

Pereira, M.G. and Arruda, M.A.Z., 2003. Vermicompost as a natural adsorbent material: characterization and potentialities for cadmium adsorption. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 14(1): 39-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-50532003000100007

Riggle, D. 1998. Vermicomposting research and educa tion. BioCycle 5(May):54-56.

Robledo, T. 2002. Producción de hortalizas en invernadero con enfoque orgánico. pp 47-48. In: Memorias de la XIV Semana Internacional de Agronomía Facultad de Agronomía y Zootecnia (FAZ) de la Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango (UJED). Torreón, Coah., México.

Schmidt, R. H., Jr. 1989. The arid zones of Mexico: cli matic extremes and conceptualization of the Sonoran Desert. J. Arid Environ. 16: 241-256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1963(18)30940-6

SAS (Statistical Analysis System for Windows). 1998. Version 6.12 Cary, N.C. USA.

Subler, S., Edwards, C., and Metzger, J. 1998. Com paring Vermicomposts And Composts. BioCycle. 39(7): 63-66.

Velasco-Velasco, J., Ferrera-Cerrato, R. y Almaraz Suárez, J. J., 2003. Vermicomposta, micorriza arbuscular y Azospirillum brasilense en tomate de cáscara. Terra. 19(3): 241-248.

Downloads

Published

2005-04-30

Issue

Section

Artículos de divulgación

How to Cite

Rendimiento y calidad de dos genotipos de tomate, cultivado en mezclas de vermicomposta y arena, bajo condiciones de invernadero. (2005). Agraria, 2(1), 22-28. https://doi.org/10.59741/agraria.v2i1.322

  PLUMX Metrics

Most read articles by the same author(s)