Varietal description of three fodder wheat genotypes for northeast México

Authors

  • María Alejandra Torres-Tapia Centro de Capacitación y Desarrollo en Tecnología de Semillas, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro. Calzada Antonio Narro 1923, Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila, México. 25315
  • Miguel Ángel Valdez-Hernández Maestría en Tecnología de Granos y Semillas, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro. Calzada Antonio Narro 1923, Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila, México. 25315
  • Víctor Manuel Zamora-Villa Departamento de Fitomejoramiento, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro. 25315 Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila, México.
  • Modesto Colín-Rico Departamento de Fitomejoramiento, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro. 25315 Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila, México.
  • Mario Ernesto Vázquez-Badillo Centro de Capacitación y Desarrollo en Tecnología de Semillas, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro. Calzada Antonio Narro 1923, Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila, México. 25315

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59741/agraria.v13i2.579

Keywords:

Varietal description, qualitative, quantitative

Abstract

To qualify for registration with the Sistema Nacional de Inspección y Certificación de Semillas, it is necessary to have a variety description to show that the genotype is new and different, this test is performed after the breeder has completed its work of improvement. The present study was in order to obtain the varietal description of four genotypes of feed wheat to northeastern Mexico, with AN-373-09, 366-09 and AN-AN-263-99 generated by the program belonging to Cerea Universidad Autonoma Agraria Antonio Narro, and compared with the commercial variety Bacanora. They were assessed at three location in the northeast (Navidad NL, Zaragoza and Buenavista Coah.), under the guidelines issued by the UPOV (1994), evaluating randomly 50 plants in the field and 20 in the greenhouse with three replications in different phenological stage. The results of quantitative descriptors were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative were reported in percentage of each level of characterization. The AN-373- 09, 366-09 and AN-AN-263-99 genotypes were distinguished in four of five quantitative traits compared to the control; AN-373-09 in six of 21; 366-09 in nine AN-21 and AN-21 263-99 in five of all qualitative characteristics related Bacanora (control). The genotypes analyzed differ in at least one characteristic and thereby meet the requirement of being new and different.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Boschi, F., & M. Ibarra, M. 2012. Análisis de la distinción, homogeneidad y estabilidad (DHE) de nuevos cultivares de papa (Solanum tuberosum L.) en Uruguay. Agrociencia Uruguay. 16(2):74-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.17.542

Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical. 1983. Metodologías para obtener semillas de calidad arroz, frijol, maíz, sorgo. Ed. Unidad de semillas CIAT. Cali, Colombia. 198 p.

Chávez, G., P. Figueroa, M.A. Camacho, G. Fuentes, J.L. Félix, & V. Valenzuela. 2012. Patronato Oro C2008, trigo cristalino con calidad industrial para el noroeste de México. Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas. 3(7):1441-1446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v3i7.1350

Close, D. C. & C.L. Beadle. 2003. The ecophysiology of foliar anthocyanin. The Botanical Review. 69(2):149-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1663/0006-8101(2003)069[0149:TEOFA]2.0.CO;2

Ferrer, J. L., M.B. Austin, C. Stewart, & J.P. Noel. 2008. Structure and function of enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of phenylpropanoids. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 46(3):356-370. 86 Agraria. Vol. 13, núm. 3, septiembre-diciembre, 2016 Torres-Tapia et al. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2007.12.009

Flores, A., M.E. Vázquez, F. Borrego, & D. Sánchez. 2011. Análisis de la homogeneidad, distinción y estabilidad de tres variedades sobresalientes de tomate. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas. 2(1):5-16.

Fuentes, G., P. Figueroa, V. Valenzuela, G. Chávez, J.L. Félix, & J.A. Mendoza. 2012. Huatabampo Oro C2009, nueva variedad de trigo cristalino para el noroeste de México. Revista fitotecnia mexicana. 35(4):351-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35196/rfm.2012.4.351

García, G. M., & F.G. Cháirez. 2010. Reporte agrometeorológico. inifap. Folleto informativo No. 79. 28p.

Izdebski, R. 1992. Utilization of rye genetic resources – initial material selection. Hereditas. 116:179-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1992.tb00820.x

Jennings, P. R., L.E. Berrio, E. Torres, & E. Corredor. 2002. Una estrategia de mejoramiento para incrementar el potencial de rendimiento en arroz. Foro Arrocero Latinoamericano. 8(2):10-13.

Khlestkina, E., E. Antonova, L. Pershina, A. Soloviev, E. Badaeva, A. Börner, & E. Salina. 2011. Variability of Rc (red coleoptile) alleles in wheat and wheat-alien genetic stock collections. Cereal Research Communication., 39(4):465-474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/CRC.39.2011.4.1

Lykholay, A. N., I.A. Vladimirov, E.A. Andreeva, V.G. Smirnov, & A.V. Voylokov. 2014. Genetics of anthocyaninless rye. Russian Journal of Genetics. 50(10):1102-1106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795414100081

Machado, N. B., M.R. Prioli, A.B. Gatti, & V.J. Mendes. 2006. Temperature effects on seed germination in races of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Acta Scientiarum Agronomy. 28:155-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v28i2.976

upov. 1994. Guidelines for the conduct of test for distinctness, homogeneity and stability of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend, Fiori et Paol.). 21p.

Villaseñor, H. E., y E. Espitia R. 2000. El trigo de temporal en México. Chapingo, Estado de México, México, SAGAR, INIFAP, Campo Experimental Valle de México. 85-98p.

Zadoks, J. C., T.T. Chang, & C.F. Konzak. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed res.14(6):415-421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x

Downloads

Published

2016-08-30

Issue

Section

Artículos de divulgación

How to Cite

Varietal description of three fodder wheat genotypes for northeast México. (2016). Agraria, 13(2), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.59741/agraria.v13i2.579

  PLUMX Metrics

Most read articles by the same author(s)