Retención de humedad en hojas separadas de la planta de cártamo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59741/agraria.v14i2.242Keywords:
Carthamus tinctorus, dry weight, resistance to transpirationAbstract
The estimation of retained moisture in the cut leaves of a culture is a useful tech nique to classify the varieties according to its degree of resistance to drought. In this research 16 varieties of carthamus were assayed for its capacity of moisture retention in the cut leaves, considering the inheritability in an ample sense, and to evaluate phenotypical corre lations.
One seed of each genotype was sowed in a black polyethylene bag 120 cm in length and 30 cm of diameter. An experimental design of random.blocks with three replications was applied. The experimental parcel included a bag with two plants per treatment and replication. Forty five days after growth five leaves per plant were cut. The fresh weight from the leaves was recorded. Later, the leaves were placed in a drying room, on a table, to a temperature of about 20 to 22°C. the leaves weight was recorded after 24 and 48 hours, and finally the constant dry weight, after placing them in a furnace to 70°C, for 24 hours.
The variance analysis showed highly significant differences for fresh and dry sprout weight, initial moisture content in the leaves, humidity after 24 and 48 hours, after drying of the leaves, revealing a considerable variability between the studied genotypes. The dry weight of the sprouts varied between 18,8 and 26,9 g per plant, with an average of 23,1 g. Genotypes Alhuey, Kino 76 and Gila produced more dry matter per plant. The leaves of the varieties Noroeste-VF84, CVF36, Washington, Saffola 208, Humaya 65, 70 River and Jerusalem CM 1136 lost around 98 % of moisture after 48 hours after cut. The varieties Kino 76, Egypt CM 1239, Gila, Aceitera and Pakistan CM 799 retained a greater percentage of moisture and showed resistance to transpiration. The hereditability in an ample sense varied between 70,6 and 96,7 % for all the studied traits.
Downloads
References
Beggs, J. E. 1980. Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress. In. N.C. Turner and P.J. Kramer. Eds. Whiley, New York. pp 33-42.
Blum, A. 1979. Genetic improvement of drought resistance in crop plants. A case for sorghum. Stress Physiology in crop plants. In: Harry Musell. De. John Wiley, New York. pp 429-445.
Clarke, J. M. and T. F. Townly-Smith. 1986. Heritability and relationship to yield of excised leaf water retention in durum wheat. Crop Sci. 25: 289-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1986.0011183X002600020016x
Dedio, w. 1975. Water relations in wheat leaves as screening tests for drought resistance. Can. J. Plant Sci. 55: 369-378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps75-059
Kirkham, M. B., E. L. Smith, C. Dhanasobhon, and T. I. Drake. 1980. Resistance to water los of winter wheat flag leaves. Cereal Research Communication. 8(2): 393-399. Kuruvadi, S. 1987. Retención de agua en hojas cortadas de frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Folleto de Divulgación 1(2): 1-10.
Kuruvadi, S. 1988. Características de planta que contribuyen a la mejor adaptación de los cultivos a regiones semidesérticas. Folleto de Divulgación. 11 (4): 1-17. Salim, M. H., G. W. Todd and C.A. Stutte. 1969. Evaluation of techniques for measuring drought avoidance in cereal seedlings. Agron. J. 1: 182-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1969.00021962006100020003x
Specht, J. E. and J. H. Williams. 1978. Testing soybean for heat and drought tolerance. Eight Soybean Seed Research Conference. pp. 17-31.
Turner, N.C. 1979. Drought resistance and adaptation to water deficits in crop plants. stress physiology in crop plants. In: Harry Mussell. De. John Wiley. New York. pp. 344- 372.
Turner, N.C. 1986. Crop water deficits: a decade of progress. Adv. in Agron. 39: 1-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60464-2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
PLUMX Metrics